[Aavso-photometry] Flat Stuff
Arne Henden
aah at nofs.navy.mil
Tue Jan 18 16:59:08 EST 2005
Richard Miles wrote:
> Arne Henden wrote:
>
>> If I were you, I would test this. I have yet to see an electronic
>> shutter that was perfect. Our uniblitz shutters, for example, start
>> to leave an objectionable vignetting pattern for any exposure shorter
>> than 3 sec. Flats are the most important calibration you will do,
>> and any error in the flats impact all science frames. Test them in
>> many ways.
>
>
> Arne - thanks for making the point about shutter vignetting, it's a key
> limitation with flats depending on the CCD camera. The fast readout of
> USB 2.0 interface cameras does help to increase the rate at which images
> can be taken and saved to disk. I use the SXV-H9 camera and image
> readout/save times are between 1-4 sec depending on binning. My
> finished flats usually comprise an average of 100 frames.
>
The interline chips are the exception to my statements about shutters.
Since the interline "shuttering" is done by quickly moving charge from
the imaging columns into adjacent light-blocked storage columns,
the differential exposure across the field remains constant, no matter what
exposure time is chosen; the only possible error is in determining the
actual exposure time used.
My statements were more towards mechanical shutters controlled
electronically. Sorry if I caused some confusion!
Arne
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list