[Aavso-photometry] IRAF photcal -- worth it?
Greg Crawford
gc at nelsonbay.com
Sun Feb 6 21:32:46 EST 2005
If all this is too terrifying, save yourself the angst and try an easy
Windows-based solution. "Canopus" from MPO Software is a Windows based
application which will calculate transformation and extinction coefficients and
is relatively cheap compared to other software on offering. It works well for
both variable stars and asteroids. A new edition will be out soon.
See: http://www.minorplanetobserver.com/htms/mpocanopus.htm
Greg Crawford
*
* *
*
*
. _
.' \\`.
. |__''_|
| |
| 433 |
_.'-----'-._
/ \__
Bagnall Beach Observatory
http://www.nelsonbay.com/~gc/observatory.htm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aavso-photometry-bounces at mira.aavso.org [mailto:aavso-photometry-
> bounces at mira.aavso.org] On Behalf Of Michael Koppelman
> Sent: Monday, 7 February 2005 3:53 AM
> To: 'aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org' list)
> Subject: [Aavso-photometry] IRAF photcal -- worth it?
>
> Since I am pretty comfortable with IRAF I thought maybe I'd start using
> photcal to do my transformation coefficients. Chuck P. has mentioned
> this in the past. A quick look at the help terrified me:
>
> --> help photcal
> digiphot.photcal:
> mkapfile - Prepare aperture corrections file from
> apphot/daophot output
> mkcatalog - Type in a standard star catalog or observations file
> mkimsets - Prepare an image set file for input to (mk)(n)obsfile
> mk(n)obsfile - Prepare an oservations file from apphot/daophot output
> mkphotcors - Prepare the photometric corrections files
> apfile - Prepare an aperture corrections file from a text file
> obsfile - Prepare an observations file from a text file
>
> mkconfig - Prepare a configuration file
> chkconfig - Check the configuration file for grammar and syntax
> errors
> fitparams - Compute the parameters of the transformation equations
> evalfit - Compute the standard indices by evaluating the fit
> invertfit - Compute the standard indices by inverting the fit
>
> This looks nightmarishly complex. Currently I use IRAF to do the ccd
> reductions and photometry and then just use perl and Excel to compute
> my coefficients and do transformations on observations.
>
> Do I really want to go through the pain of learning photcal? I reread
> Chuck's Zen of IRAF on the subject and it seems doable but...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Michael Koppelman
> http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aavso-photometry mailing list
> Aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
> http://www.aavso.org/mailman/listinfo/aavso-photometry
Greg Crawford
*
* *
*
*
. _
.' \\`.
. |__''_|
| |
| 433 |
_.'-----'-._
/ \__
Bagnall Beach Observatory
http://www.nelsonbay.com/~gc/observatory.htm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aavso-photometry-bounces at mira.aavso.org [mailto:aavso-photometry-
> bounces at mira.aavso.org] On Behalf Of Michael Koppelman
> Sent: Monday, 7 February 2005 3:53 AM
> To: 'aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org' list)
> Subject: [Aavso-photometry] IRAF photcal -- worth it?
>
> Since I am pretty comfortable with IRAF I thought maybe I'd start using
> photcal to do my transformation coefficients. Chuck P. has mentioned
> this in the past. A quick look at the help terrified me:
>
> --> help photcal
> digiphot.photcal:
> mkapfile - Prepare aperture corrections file from
> apphot/daophot output
> mkcatalog - Type in a standard star catalog or observations file
> mkimsets - Prepare an image set file for input to (mk)(n)obsfile
> mk(n)obsfile - Prepare an oservations file from apphot/daophot output
> mkphotcors - Prepare the photometric corrections files
> apfile - Prepare an aperture corrections file from a text file
> obsfile - Prepare an observations file from a text file
>
> mkconfig - Prepare a configuration file
> chkconfig - Check the configuration file for grammar and syntax
> errors
> fitparams - Compute the parameters of the transformation equations
> evalfit - Compute the standard indices by evaluating the fit
> invertfit - Compute the standard indices by inverting the fit
>
> This looks nightmarishly complex. Currently I use IRAF to do the ccd
> reductions and photometry and then just use perl and Excel to compute
> my coefficients and do transformations on observations.
>
> Do I really want to go through the pain of learning photcal? I reread
> Chuck's Zen of IRAF on the subject and it seems doable but...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Michael Koppelman
> http://www.lolife.com/astronomy/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aavso-photometry mailing list
> Aavso-photometry at mira.aavso.org
> http://www.aavso.org/mailman/listinfo/aavso-photometry
More information about the Aavso-photometry
mailing list